Guest User
September 17, 2024
This is my first time to write a negative review. This hotel does not live up to its reputation in all aspects at this price. I suggest you avoid it.
Environment: There is a construction site around the room. It started making noises in the morning until noon, making it impossible to rest. Rather than saying that the guests live on the grassland, it is better to say that they live next to a construction site.
Facilities: The bath water is hot and cold, the breakfast is rough and simple, the only protein comes from an egg and a glass of milk. This cannot be explained by the logistical inconvenience of the grassland, because the other hard furnishings of the hotel have been built, so why can't it be equipped with good shower facilities and food. The reviewer has stayed in other areas with more difficult conditions, and a constant temperature of the bathing water is a basic requirement.
Cleanliness: There was a bug corpse in the room, but the abundance of bugs can be explained by the location of the hotel on the grassland. In addition, piles of yak dung can be seen with the naked eye on the edge of the room, exuding bursts of smell. Although the herds of cattle and sheep are beautiful, the excretion problems and visual impact that come with it are unavoidable.
Service: The service is the most disappointing thing. There is no parking lot around the room, which means that the luggage needs to be pulled across a long (about 20 meters) grass road. And when you first asked the waiter for help, you were refused. It shows that in addition to objective issues such as ability, there are still major subjective issues in hotel service attitude. More than 1,000 hotels that the reviewer has stayed at have valet bag-carrying services. In theory, labor costs on the grassland should be cheaper rather than more expensive, so this hotel obviously does not live up to its name at this price.
Original TextTranslation provided by Google